Remember the Opera Software of old and new

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Since the early days Opera Software has been renowned for their web browser, their support for (open) web standards, and their strictness in following it. But besides supporting the web they are known as innovators, at a level where other companies, including the oh so beloved Apple, look at for the next step in their own web browsers.

But recently it seems that a lot of (casual) people regard Opera Software entirely differently. While ignoring history and Opera’s innovations, people seem to see Opera as a sore loser, who has failed where Firefox succeeded, and is on the verge of extinction. People especially see the recent case by the European Commission, to bring equilibrium in the browser market, as Opera Software’s doing. But nothing is that simple…

Let’s start with the European Commission case (which currently only applies to EU citizens). Originally Opera Software asked the EC to take a look into the case where Microsoft bundles Internet Explorer with Windows, and causes unfair competition. This applies only to Windows, because Microsoft controls a monopoly (which is specified in the EU rules) and therefor also has a strong grip on the web (which they first failed to pick up in the early days).

Long ago when Netscape was still a good company, everything changed, Microsoft began bundling IE with Windows (especially using OEM releases) and slowly but surely gained enough momentum (in combination with Netscape’s failing in bringing the rewrite on time) to capture the market. After that innovation stalled, IE broke the web with flawed standards support. While Netscape survived in the shape of Mozilla, it was a time when Opera was one of the few survivors that kept working on web standards and innovation. Well, we know how it goes after that, Mozilla Suite didn’t get a lot of people, but with hard good work Firefox came to be, and at the right time with the insecureness awareness of Windows and IE they created enough momentum to become popular. Of course there must have been some jealousy at Opera Software on how Firefox was embraced and gained popularity. But there has never been hate up in the north, and truth to be told, Opera did gain a lot of users as well, as people got aware, awakened if you’d like. Even Opera learned from Firefox, as it became free when enough revenue was gained from other sources, such as Google and Yahoo! searches. Currently Opera Software is financially strong, and has a strong hand in the mobile (Windows, Symbian, Java) market, as well as devices (Wii, DS, Zii). Like any healthy company Opera Software wants more, more market share, more money, etc. But unlike other companies, they still value their own vision, of keeping the web open, on any device, for any one out there.

But back to the EC case against Microsoft. After it was decided that Microsoft needed to create a Windows XP N Edition, without the Windows Media Player, the legal munchos at Opera Software saw fit to ask, I said ask not force, the EC to look into the browser market. As it nearly seems an identical case the EC was quick to pick up, as this time there are several companies still at stake here. Note that from this point on Opera Software hasn’t done anything, the EC was asked to investigate and have found out that Microsoft indeed has been misusing their position for their web browser. Any decision by the EC is done without Opera, Mozilla, Apple, Google or Microsoft. All the companies are free to give their comments, advice and support for the case. So has Opera Software done for the last months, they’ve suggested a ballot screen and apparently EC (and several allies) finds in interesting as well. You’ll have to understand that things like this are more or less organic developments, as you’ve probably read Microsoft has turned around and worked on documents for the ballot screen with their proposal of rules for inclusion and display. It’s up to the EC to approve or disapprove, and the folks at Opera/Mozilla have spoken aloud on the web what they thought of it. So as you can see, Opera cannot force the EC, as they work independently, any justice or injustice directed at Microsoft comes from the EC directly.

However it doesn’t help that several people at Opera Software have said things that were either, ripped from context, or simple reversed questions. A lot of what has been said were advice or (wild) ideas, and yes they sounded bad, like whining as some have said. No, I don’t agree that Opera should be in Windows Update, I would go for a global unified update system that all apps, whether browser or not can plug into, such as the update feature in Linux (though apt, yum, etc.) or App Store (iPhone/iPod touch). Whether then to dismiss or argue any of the comments from some Opera folks you should ask yourself, am I too emotional, could they simply be wrong this time? EC case or not, use Opera, or any other browser because you like it, it’s features, the looks. Remember that everybody is human, and no doubt some people say stuff with emotion or get wrongly quoted (for sensational purposes). Take some distance, and be “nuchter” about it (yeah look that word up… hint, it’s dutch).

Looking at Opera 10 there are of course things missing and we all, yeah me too I confess, say bad stuff about it. It’s not because the entire thing is bad or evil, but because we know, we feel that something could become so much more. Imagine Opera 11, with the super fast JavaScript engine (equal to Chrome), ICC profile version 4 support, Vegas for 3D acceleration, private browsing mode, etc. We know it’s unrealistic to have it all in one go, however we also all know that it should be there to finish of the competition. But the truth is, it’s not possible, not without a healthy balance between work force and financial results. Opera 10 comes already with so much more. First of all the folks listened to us by bringing spell check (with dictionary download), major improvements to the mail client (really there isn’t much else out there that’s free and good), auto-update, a brand new look, and much, much more.

Opera Software is still the same as we know it, innovation and fighting for an open web (heck why do you think they don’t sue people with random patents). Remember this first and foremost, distance yourself from the EC case, and remain “nuchter” while seeking out the “why” someone says something, and remember that everybody makes mistakes.

read more

Motherboards for Linux

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Hey all. One of the biggest issues I’ve had with creating linux systems is hardware. Specifically, motherboards. It doesn’t take more then a couple of months for motherboard models to come and go. What does that mean for you and me?

Well, to really make money with linux and NOT WASTE TIME, you need to be able to cookie-cutter the whole process of building the boxes. This requires a bit of consistency on the hardware.

I’ve tried many sources, but I’ve always gravitated to Intel chipsets on the motherboards. I’ve found, time after time, to be the best supported. But you still must be cautious as there are chipsets that may be too new or just not supported out of the distribution without building the drivers.

Yesterday, I did come across a board from ASUS that I really like. It’s the only board that I’ve tried in the past year that has been completely compatible to Centos 5.1 without driver mods or boot command mods. It’s the Asus P5E-VM DO motherboard.

This motherboard works like a charm. The two big things that usually cause problems is the gigabit network card and the hard drive controller. I had no issues with either on Centos. They just worked! Very well as a matter of fact.

There is no fallouts in the network card and the hard drive controller is running at the proper SATA speeds. I use software mirroring quite extensively, because first, it works well and second, it’s really cheap.

So, if you are looking at a good motherboard for Centos, then you need to take a peek at this board. Be sure to get the P5E-VM DO model. There are other models in the P5E line and the chipsets are different.

Cheers.

Tags: , , ,

Time to update…New Thunderbird version!, (Fri, Aug 21st)

by Admin on August 23, 2009

A new version of Thunderbird, version 2.0.0.23, is available. Thus update fixes MFSA 2009-42 (Compromise of SSL-protected communication).
If you are a Thunderbird user, it is probably best to apply this update as soon as convenient.
Update:
It appears this update, which affects multiple Mozilla products, has changed the rules for security certificates generated with wildcards. More information is available at the Fourmilab Blog.
– Rick Wanner - rwanner at isc dot sans dot org

FINDWHAT buys ESpotting

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Amid all of the rumors of Yahoo buying eSpotting, FindWhat slips though the cracks and aquires the company. FindWhat.com, an Internet search engine operator, said on Wednesday that it is buying privately-owned Espotting Media Inc. for $163 million to create an Internet marketing company.

Google Expands Advertising with AdSense

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Google has just introduced a new advertising program which lets smaller web sites run Google advertisements on their sites and get paid per click by Google.
This is an expansion of their AdWords program which added Contextual
AdWords earlier in the year.
To apply online for the program, website publishers can visit www.google.com/adsense. Google’s editorial team will review each publisher application to ensure that the site meets editorial guidelines. To activate the service, the publisher logs into their account and cuts and pastes a small piece of HTML into their web pages or ad server.

Hello World :)

by Admin on August 23, 2009

My name is Stefan and I am the new owner of GW.

Hope we will have nice time here on Graphics World.

CU.

House Industries presents Alexander Girard [webdesign]

by Admin on August 23, 2009

House Industries joins forces with 60’s textile design icon Alexander Girard to present a new line of playful fonts and objects. In this age of greening and Woodstock anniversaries, Girard’s joyful objects and shapes with their roots in the

Java development 2.0: Hello Google App Engine

by Admin on August 21, 2009

Open source solutions and borrowed infrastructures are changing the character of Java development, letting you deliver better software quickly and at a low cost. Andrew Glover, coining the term Java development 2.0 to encapsulate the cumulative force of these phenomena, launches a new series on some of the relevant tools and technologies. This first installment heralds the arrival of Java development 2.0 and explains how you can bring its concepts to fruition quickly with Google’s App Engine for Java.

System Administrator Appreciation Day

by Admin on August 21, 2009

WindowsNetworking team wishes all the best to all system administrators out there. May your networks never go down and your servers always stay running.. more…