From the monthly archives:

August 2009

The Simulation World

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Daren Scot Wilson:
I live in Orlando, apparently the Mecca of the simulation world.? Job searches often turn up positions in which secret clearances are needed.? These local companies make aircraft simulators, military weapons trainers, large machine repair training simulators, etc.? Many of these companies have military customers.? Recruiters have been calling me since January telling me about one position or another in simulation.

This may sound exciting to some people, but being more peace oriented, I’m concerned about working for military customers.? Perhaps that can be avoided; there are plenty of civilian commercial projects too.

Also, some say that simulation software development is a fairly closed world where you practically have to already be a member to join.? But then, I’m not sure what to believe, as I’ve never been in this world and have only a sketchy impression.? (I don’t give a lot of weight to what recruiters say.)

What I like about simulation is the combination of software development with 3D graphics, geometry, physics and high-performance number crunching.? The pay is good, too.? So I don’t know if it’s wise to go for a job in simulation.? Has anyone been in this world, who can describe what it’s really like in there, and answer my concerns?

Traceability Matrix Before Development!

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Mr. Smith:
In our IT shop, we have started a new process of using traceability matrix. Our managers have asked the developers to start capturing as much functionality as possible upfront. Actually, what we are doing is that we are writing high-level business requirement first for the requested features and then making them single-line statement capturing all the specific functionality. It’s one-to-many relationship between requirement and specific functionality. For instance, the behavior of the buttons, navigation, message prompts, enabling and disabling, and so forth.

The idea of this exercise is to make sure that we capture every possible scenario for the desired feature; thus reducing the number of defects and avoiding missing features. A lot of times, testers open defects for scenarios that actually do not reflect the real world scenarios. I do understand that the design should be done in such a way that the user is unable to break the application. However, our application is highly flexible and customized for each client. Not all the functionality is applicable for the all the clients, so we find a middle ground where we see if such a scenario can happen in the client’s workflow. And, if not, then it’s the user’s training issue.

Initially, I liked the idea, thinking this process will familiarize each developer thoroughly with the specific requirements and reduce bugs that are missed during development. But as I am doing this now, it’s getting too detailed and I am finding it difficult to stay focused. Personally, I would’ve prefered the iterative process to start building something in smaller pieces, but we have strict deadlines and the scope lock is a must before the development can begin. Any delay spawns a process of deviation for the project.

Any thoughts…if this is an approach in the right direction? Or, it’s just me who is feeling lazy on Friday :) .

How you get your CSM does matter!

by Admin on August 23, 2009

The traditional CSM course is only two days. That’s not enough time to cover the things a ScrumMaster needs to know to help their team be successful.

Kate Oneal: Slices

by Admin on August 23, 2009

The team has fallen far short in the most recent iteration. What should they do?

Aug 19, I think Microsoft should convert all Vista to XP

by Admin on August 23, 2009

I have had nothing but problems Saving and Accessing my work. I hate Vista and think there should be a free replacement to XP. I lose work every

The most common Windows fonts

by Admin on August 23, 2009

The most common reported font on the Windows platform is the system font Microsoft Sans Serif, reported in practically 100% of submissions. Mathew Carter’s sans serif Verdana is in second position, followed by the Windows system font Tahoma and sans serif Arial. The classic typewriter font Courier New complete the top 5 most common Windows fonts at 99% frequency.

House Industries presents Alexander Girard [webdesign]

by Admin on August 23, 2009

House Industries joins forces with 60’s textile design icon Alexander Girard to present a new line of playful fonts and objects. In this age of greening and Woodstock anniversaries, Girard’s joyful objects and shapes with their roots in the

Unite won’t be part of Opera 10.0 release

by Admin on August 23, 2009

The Opera Desktop Team released two new snapshots today both with and without their Opera Unite service. While the development team is making good progress it seems that it won’t be part of the upcoming 10.0 release after all.

Opera Unite was introduced sometime later than the first beta of Opera 10 and it seems that the development unfortunately won’t be able to finish it in time to be included in the Opera 10.0 release. Instead, as the Opera Desktop Team blog suggests, it will be part of Opera 10.10, which will be released as soon as possible.

Of course as soon as possible means once it has met the standards of Opera’s QA department. Of course this will be a slight disappointment, but Opera 10.0 still comes with a lot of improvements on it’s own.

To try the latest snapshots (with or without Unite), as well as the full changelog, go to the Opera Desktop Team blog. Be sure to report any (critical) issues as with the splitting in 10.0 and 10.10 the final release should be relatively near.

read more

Remember the Opera Software of old and new

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Since the early days Opera Software has been renowned for their web browser, their support for (open) web standards, and their strictness in following it. But besides supporting the web they are known as innovators, at a level where other companies, including the oh so beloved Apple, look at for the next step in their own web browsers.

But recently it seems that a lot of (casual) people regard Opera Software entirely differently. While ignoring history and Opera’s innovations, people seem to see Opera as a sore loser, who has failed where Firefox succeeded, and is on the verge of extinction. People especially see the recent case by the European Commission, to bring equilibrium in the browser market, as Opera Software’s doing. But nothing is that simple…

Let’s start with the European Commission case (which currently only applies to EU citizens). Originally Opera Software asked the EC to take a look into the case where Microsoft bundles Internet Explorer with Windows, and causes unfair competition. This applies only to Windows, because Microsoft controls a monopoly (which is specified in the EU rules) and therefor also has a strong grip on the web (which they first failed to pick up in the early days).

Long ago when Netscape was still a good company, everything changed, Microsoft began bundling IE with Windows (especially using OEM releases) and slowly but surely gained enough momentum (in combination with Netscape’s failing in bringing the rewrite on time) to capture the market. After that innovation stalled, IE broke the web with flawed standards support. While Netscape survived in the shape of Mozilla, it was a time when Opera was one of the few survivors that kept working on web standards and innovation. Well, we know how it goes after that, Mozilla Suite didn’t get a lot of people, but with hard good work Firefox came to be, and at the right time with the insecureness awareness of Windows and IE they created enough momentum to become popular. Of course there must have been some jealousy at Opera Software on how Firefox was embraced and gained popularity. But there has never been hate up in the north, and truth to be told, Opera did gain a lot of users as well, as people got aware, awakened if you’d like. Even Opera learned from Firefox, as it became free when enough revenue was gained from other sources, such as Google and Yahoo! searches. Currently Opera Software is financially strong, and has a strong hand in the mobile (Windows, Symbian, Java) market, as well as devices (Wii, DS, Zii). Like any healthy company Opera Software wants more, more market share, more money, etc. But unlike other companies, they still value their own vision, of keeping the web open, on any device, for any one out there.

But back to the EC case against Microsoft. After it was decided that Microsoft needed to create a Windows XP N Edition, without the Windows Media Player, the legal munchos at Opera Software saw fit to ask, I said ask not force, the EC to look into the browser market. As it nearly seems an identical case the EC was quick to pick up, as this time there are several companies still at stake here. Note that from this point on Opera Software hasn’t done anything, the EC was asked to investigate and have found out that Microsoft indeed has been misusing their position for their web browser. Any decision by the EC is done without Opera, Mozilla, Apple, Google or Microsoft. All the companies are free to give their comments, advice and support for the case. So has Opera Software done for the last months, they’ve suggested a ballot screen and apparently EC (and several allies) finds in interesting as well. You’ll have to understand that things like this are more or less organic developments, as you’ve probably read Microsoft has turned around and worked on documents for the ballot screen with their proposal of rules for inclusion and display. It’s up to the EC to approve or disapprove, and the folks at Opera/Mozilla have spoken aloud on the web what they thought of it. So as you can see, Opera cannot force the EC, as they work independently, any justice or injustice directed at Microsoft comes from the EC directly.

However it doesn’t help that several people at Opera Software have said things that were either, ripped from context, or simple reversed questions. A lot of what has been said were advice or (wild) ideas, and yes they sounded bad, like whining as some have said. No, I don’t agree that Opera should be in Windows Update, I would go for a global unified update system that all apps, whether browser or not can plug into, such as the update feature in Linux (though apt, yum, etc.) or App Store (iPhone/iPod touch). Whether then to dismiss or argue any of the comments from some Opera folks you should ask yourself, am I too emotional, could they simply be wrong this time? EC case or not, use Opera, or any other browser because you like it, it’s features, the looks. Remember that everybody is human, and no doubt some people say stuff with emotion or get wrongly quoted (for sensational purposes). Take some distance, and be “nuchter” about it (yeah look that word up… hint, it’s dutch).

Looking at Opera 10 there are of course things missing and we all, yeah me too I confess, say bad stuff about it. It’s not because the entire thing is bad or evil, but because we know, we feel that something could become so much more. Imagine Opera 11, with the super fast JavaScript engine (equal to Chrome), ICC profile version 4 support, Vegas for 3D acceleration, private browsing mode, etc. We know it’s unrealistic to have it all in one go, however we also all know that it should be there to finish of the competition. But the truth is, it’s not possible, not without a healthy balance between work force and financial results. Opera 10 comes already with so much more. First of all the folks listened to us by bringing spell check (with dictionary download), major improvements to the mail client (really there isn’t much else out there that’s free and good), auto-update, a brand new look, and much, much more.

Opera Software is still the same as we know it, innovation and fighting for an open web (heck why do you think they don’t sue people with random patents). Remember this first and foremost, distance yourself from the EC case, and remain “nuchter” while seeking out the “why” someone says something, and remember that everybody makes mistakes.

read more

Go Incognito With Google Chrome

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Anonymity when browsing the Web can be important for a variety of reasons. Perhaps you are concerned that your sensitive data may be left behind in temporary files such as…

Add-Ons That Help Your Job Search

by Admin on August 23, 2009

The toughest side effect of our struggling economy has to be the record loss of jobs. Unemployment numbers continue to rise as more and more companies are forced to conduct…

Motherboards for Linux

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Hey all. One of the biggest issues I’ve had with creating linux systems is hardware. Specifically, motherboards. It doesn’t take more then a couple of months for motherboard models to come and go. What does that mean for you and me?

Well, to really make money with linux and NOT WASTE TIME, you need to be able to cookie-cutter the whole process of building the boxes. This requires a bit of consistency on the hardware.

I’ve tried many sources, but I’ve always gravitated to Intel chipsets on the motherboards. I’ve found, time after time, to be the best supported. But you still must be cautious as there are chipsets that may be too new or just not supported out of the distribution without building the drivers.

Yesterday, I did come across a board from ASUS that I really like. It’s the only board that I’ve tried in the past year that has been completely compatible to Centos 5.1 without driver mods or boot command mods. It’s the Asus P5E-VM DO motherboard.

This motherboard works like a charm. The two big things that usually cause problems is the gigabit network card and the hard drive controller. I had no issues with either on Centos. They just worked! Very well as a matter of fact.

There is no fallouts in the network card and the hard drive controller is running at the proper SATA speeds. I use software mirroring quite extensively, because first, it works well and second, it’s really cheap.

So, if you are looking at a good motherboard for Centos, then you need to take a peek at this board. Be sure to get the P5E-VM DO model. There are other models in the P5E line and the chipsets are different.

Cheers.

Tags: , , ,

wolvix 1.0.5 on Thinkpad 600 problems

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Forum: Linux On Laptops / Netbooks / Minibooks
Posted By: singleton
Post Time: 08-23-2009 at 10:59 AM

Google Expands Advertising with AdSense

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Google has just introduced a new advertising program which lets smaller web sites run Google advertisements on their sites and get paid per click by Google.
This is an expansion of their AdWords program which added Contextual
AdWords earlier in the year.
To apply online for the program, website publishers can visit www.google.com/adsense. Google’s editorial team will review each publisher application to ensure that the site meets editorial guidelines. To activate the service, the publisher logs into their account and cuts and pastes a small piece of HTML into their web pages or ad server.

FINDWHAT buys ESpotting

by Admin on August 23, 2009

Amid all of the rumors of Yahoo buying eSpotting, FindWhat slips though the cracks and aquires the company. FindWhat.com, an Internet search engine operator, said on Wednesday that it is buying privately-owned Espotting Media Inc. for $163 million to create an Internet marketing company.